Black Gold & Disappeared Children: How Schools Become Crime-Breeding Systems黑金消失兒少
1.Children Disappeared by the System制度下消失的兒少
This white paper examines how an educational staff member, Chen Yaqi, leveraged her position within the school system to exploit loopholes across education, social welfare, and judicial institutions. Her role exemplifies how a single actor can become a “white glove” node in a fraud network, revealing systemic vulnerabilities that undermine child protection and judicial integrity.本白皮書聚焦於一名教育體系內的職務角色──陳雅祺，如何利用學校教職員身份，結合教育、社政與司法漏洞，成為詐欺組織的「白手套」節點。此案例不僅揭示個人行為，更凸顯制度缺陷對兒少權益與司法正義的侵蝕。
2.Subsidies, Ballots, and the Hidden Deals of Power社福金流黑箱
Position: School staff involved in counseling and safety records.
職務：學校教職員、涉入輔導與校安紀錄。
Strategic Access: Simultaneously connected to students, Education Bureau, social worker networks, and prosecutorial processes.
利益位置：同時接觸學生、教育局、社工網絡與檢察體系。
Core Issues: Falsified records, account intrusions, judicial laundering of data.
問題：紀錄不實、帳號侵入、司法輸送。
3.From Falsified Records to Social Media Intrusions從紀錄造假到社群帳號入侵
4.School Staff as “White Gloves” for Fraud Networks教職員如何成為詐欺組織的內應
Education: No transparency or external audit for modification logs. Social Welfare: Social worker reports enter judicial files without cross-verification.
Judiciary: Prosecutors and judges routinely accept educational records without authenticity checks.
教育體系：缺乏異動日誌公開與外部稽核。
社政體系：社工報告未經交叉驗證即可入卷。
司法體系：檢察官與法官慣性採信教育紀錄，未檢視真偽。
5.When False Records Become Judicial Evidence.Labels, Isolation, and Systematic Erasure司法漂白程序造成兒少被消失真相
Court judgments recorded “single parent” status contrary to reality. Student IG account logins exploited to mislead judicial processes. “High-risk family” labels distorted welfare allocation and public perception.
判決書出現「單親」紀錄，與事實不符。 IG 登入紀錄被利用，誤導司法。 高風險標籤直接導致補助與社會觀感偏差。
6. From Eastern European Welfare Fraud to U.S. Campus Cases從東歐福利詐欺到美國校園案件
Taiwan lacks mandatory mechanisms for digital forensic verification. Compared to welfare fraud cases in Eastern Europe and the US, Taiwan’s reliance on school records as direct judicial evidence creates even higher risks.
台灣現行制度缺乏「數位鑑識調查」的強制機制。 與東歐社會救助詐領、美國福利詐欺案件相比，台灣更依賴校園紀錄作為司法依據，風險更高。
7.Conclusion結論
Chen Yaqi is not a mere “money mule” but a “white glove” node embedded within the education system. Her case reflects systemic imbalance rather than isolated misconduct.
陳雅祺並非基層「車手」，而是教育體系中的「白手套」節點。她的存在反映制度性失衡，而非單一偏差行為。
8.Breaking the Black Box and Preventing the Next Disappearance揭開黑箱,阻止下一個消失案件。
Establish transparent modification log mechanisms for student and counseling systems. Misconduct by educational staff must be investigated by independent bodies. Judicial findings must not rely solely on educational records; cross-verification required. Forgery of educational and welfare records should carry explicit criminal liability.
學籍與輔導系統必須建立異動日誌透明機制。 涉及不實紀錄之教職員，應由獨立單位調查。 司法不得單憑教育紀錄認定事實，需有交叉檢驗。 應將教育與社政紀錄偽造，納入刑事責任明文規範。
真實故事改編社會劇本 
發表留言